The Realtragist Manifesto

Proclaims himself in and of itself, coming from our current reality and art of our time each day result, the artistic movement that irresponsabiliza the message of the composer of any means of artistic expression to fixed rules, standards or bases prior to composition on moral issues, religious and social, making provocative art that asks the receiver on the accuracy and usefulness of so artistic it presented.

 

This obviously holds in the art, a tragic vision of realism, putting the man objectively as the only hero and villain of itself, without any extremação or dichotomy of good and evil, because attitudes are all human, so to be the Realtragism is charging the receiver of a trial about the art values explicit, fully taking the responsibility the author by the findings, this only exposes. So this call to bring contemporary artists as a provocative art, which wonders whether even on the art form that represents and is as yet unfinished, and that can only be done by those who receive.

 

Each creation Realtragist, independent branch of art shown, brings the freedom of using real, everyday life in the extreme, which is part of the act final tragic, belongs to the man and tries to human nature as it is without values or pre-established concepts, without gods or myths, showing the man as a reflection of decisions taken by all men, and it closes the row desprolongada, but increasing in itself, of uncertainty about what is actually true and correct to decide, look into one end of the human being, whether for political or religious affairs, psychological or moral ... This is the end there ... That is asking Realtragismo human existence in all its sides, always ending the tragedy from the current reality.

 

The fund has Realtragism fatalistic, but looking at their environment, making the goal a rethink about the attitudes and concepts laid down by society; divides also to the concepts social, religious and morias, but the concept art that puts its base to pour for art, which is based on the human tragedy to discuss the aspirations, and the relevance abstentions and taken daily as acceptable.

 

Thus, this interaction between art and receiver depends only himself as the ultilizador ignored. But rather an art of any ... the interaction of it, which is what makes it complete as an art, not just past the fascination of the artist to the receiver, here the action of a snake Realtragism who was feeling, and as is always tragic, the reaction is to avoid the real tragedy, which is directly linked to the overall theme of Realtragica, a change has to be in fact a repesar the values that have left these tragedies to happen ... this is the interaction, ie to supplement Realtragica art, which brings the impossible love, happiness transient, the sad happiness, loneliness followed, all seeking a rethinking about its causes, marking the tragedy as the only resolution.

 

The term is used when Realtragism takes the tragedy of reality, it is characterized by adjusting it according to the objective ... and this goal is to charge the recipient a real solution to the tragedy, or at least a rethinking of how to react to it. If it were not tragic, it would not have the goal of the action, would not and perhaps not even present some kind of solution or rethinking, because the goal of subgenera are sentimental, like love is to love or hate is to know the point of hatred on our lives, the tragedy is always to strengthen its antagonistic, as we add the tragedy in a novel ... he would have stronger, more beating, then mark this axis, the tragedy serves to support the Realtragismo is what is supported by the tragedy and called for a new conceptualization, but without paths, it just causes, presents both sides of each sentiment expressed before the tragedy called and asked an attitude or a new view on the facts, the vision which the receptor, rather than the author.

 

Is with these goals, which call for all artists, art of all segments, the turning to the Realtragism, inquiring whether this has to do not to explain its intra-reality for all, taking it as only a point to be followed, taking the art of being a mirror of the human soul to put it as the subject that no longer reflects the rather: how is it reflected that theme.

 

The ethics Realtragista is there to question the moral, but not to propose a single solution, a thesis or synthesis, then pick up the challenge on both sides of the moral dialectic.

 

The artist realtragic is an enthusiast of the discussion, so it puts you on the side that seems more fair, but what makes it so personal and not collective, representing only themselves. Realtragista be questioned is the reality in all respects, pointing the tragedy not as a question, a fatalism unadvised.

 

Our time is a busy life with many distractions and big, to think the way in which we live and the life becomes difficult, seen as useless and even divest, so call the contemporary artists that their preliminary aspirations among all peoples, so that, putting the tragedy, can, in shock, to bring all the discussion about how to live and live.

 

I manifest this art against demagoguery today. I manifest against art as political tool, and even consumer jornalístisca. I manifest not only to defend those who suffer, not only accused the causing the pain, but to show that all the suffering and causing suffering to their choices. Thus, claims to take into account that we are here, we, the artists was sold to discuss only what is the pain and not to the point that both human suffering, or that both want this suffering.

 

Call all the art to treat the man and not just more for the art, because we should not ignore who we are to be facing what we represent in explicit, but we should see it, so I ask, to reconsider the tragedy the question about how our neglect with reality, a kind of alienation, a responsibility on the facts ... as if we were not the cause of it, which is unacceptable to Realtragism where man defines the human being.

 

In the end, I ask not to float on the reality, leaving it without a narrator artistic ... narrator that this is what keeps the art alive and feeds back. No, we must plunge into reality and bring the art of it, otherwise it dies, it is overshadowed with time, becoming something that has been, while the man is still and will be.

 

"To this day, tell me Realtragist, because people are the measure of choice, the whole tragedy is neglect of the causes of it, and Realtragism Realism is based on the human drama of the tragic effect."

 

Hiago Rodrigues Reis de Queirós, March 20, 2006

 

The day of the manifest

 

On March 20, 2006, a young writer, called: Hiago Reis Rodrigues de Queiros, was invited to give a talk to three classes of students of literary theory, at the junction between the collaborative faculties: UEPG, and CESCAGE UFPR. On occasion, Hiago been invited to comment on their peculiar way of composing literature, where it defended the poor and oppressed and not to the classes and most successful in today's society.

Then, aged 16, explained to students and teachers, the main objective of hitherto "form with which he wrote" was to bring the dicussão where the two ends of the story, then showing that it is not a hero and hero a villain who is not only villain, but is also a victim of this hero.

The Realtragismo was formed there, now that discussion yet, when did a brief pause in the speech to calm the animals ... Writer and again briefly in the table with four sheets of paper in hand, newly written, and even before all were in their seats, began to read. It was Realtragista Manifesto, founding the Arts and provocative call for rethinking of human values.